|
Structure
|
- Paper is logically organized
- Effective, smooth, and logical transitions
|
- Paper has a clear organizational structure with some digressions, ambiguities or
irrelevances
|
- There is some level of organization though digressions, ambiguities,
irrelevances are too many
|
- There is no apparent organization to the paper.
|
|
Grammar/mechanics
|
- Manipulates complex sentences for effect/impact
- No punctuation or mechanicalerrors
|
- Few punctuation or mechanicalerrors
|
- Too many punctuation and/or mechanicalerrors
|
|
|
Language
- Vocabulary; use of vocabulary
|
- Vocabulary is sophisticated and correct as are sentences which vary
in structure and length
- Uses and manipulates subject specific vocabulary foreffect
- Writer’s tone is clear, consistent and appropriate for intendedaudience
|
- Vocabulary is varied, specific andappropriate
- Frequently uses subject specific vocabulary correctly
- Writer’s tone emerges and is generally appropriate to audience
|
- Vocabulary is used properly though sentences may besimple
- Infrequently uses subject specific vocabulary correctly
- Writer’s tone exhibits some level of audience sensitivity
|
- Vocabulary is unsophisticated, notused properly in very simple sentences.
- Uses subject specific vocabulary too sparingly
|
|
Content/information
- Critical and original thought
|
- Central idea is well developed and clarity of purpose is exhibited throughout
the paper
- Abundance of evidence of critical, careful thought and analysis and/or
insight
- Evidence and examples are vivid and specific, while focus remainstight
|
- Central idea and clarity of purpose are generally evident throughout
the essay
- Evidence of critical, careful thought and analysis and/orinsight
- There are good, relevant supporting examples and evidence
|
- The central idea is expressed though it may be vague or too broad;
Some sense of purpose is maintained throughout the essay
- Some evidence of critical, careful thought and analysis and/orinsight
- There are some examples and evidence, though general
|
- Central idea and clarity of purpose are absent or incompletely expressed
andmaintained
- Little or no evidence of critical, careful thought or analysis and/orinsight
- There are too few, no examples and evidence or they are mostlyirrelevant
|